INTRODUCTION: I am writing this introduction to the article on Christmas
Eve, year 2000. Many of you may not celebrate Christmas at all. I am sure that
many of you celebrate other traditions that occur at this time around the world.
My focus today, is popular Christianity, and my research on Christ is the focus
of that study. My research into the UFOs of the Bible, has led me to a
startling new theory. That theory is, that the UFO phenomenon, presently
reported around our world in ever-growing numbers, is a sign that precedes the
collapse of civilizations since recorded time. This fact was echoed by famed
psychologist Carl Jung, who was so alarmed by this possibility, that he risked
his reputation as a psychotherapist to present this evidence as his warning,
that the UFO phenomenon was a very real presence and not one to be ignored.
It is popular to make fun of those who profess a belief in the subject of our
Christmas story, the Messiah, Yeshua or Christ. There are many popular
assertions presently being popularized by hype, misconceptions and out-right
distortions of what worshipping Christ is all about. Out-right bigotry. I have
witnessed several instances, and acquaintances have pointed out others, that
bigoted slurs are becoming commonplace on popular radio programs, like the Tom
Lycos show and others I will not mention.
Is it this the popular consensus amongst media giants, that Christianity is
stupid? Or, is it simply any belief in God, or higher being, religion or faith,
which shows that person's ignorance? I heard one television talk show host for
the program "Politically Incorrect," suggested that the deeper one's
personal belief, the greater their ignorance! I am not sure if they do this to
increases their ratings, or if they honestly believe it.
I would be the first to agree, that there are certainly aspects to popular
eschatology that leave allot to be desired, beginning with interpretation. But
remember that civilization has enjoyed a long period of relative peace,
following Christ's crucifixion, which has taken us well beyond the regular
interval of the rise and fall of all civilizations before present. The cycle in
years given by Sitchen is approximately 1,300 years between the rise and
subsequent fall of a civilization. This cycle has historically been an accurate
measure of many civilizations that preceded us in the historic past, beginning
with the rising from the ashes to the downfall and complete collapse from its
decay. What I am saying here, is that each complete collapse of any great
empire or civilization was preceded by the appearance of what some would call
the UFOs phenomena today.
Sitchen proclaims the appearance of Niburu during those times was more than
coincidental, and that its close proximity to earth preceded the arrival of
Annunaki. It was this advanced race of people that bred with Adam's offspring
nephum, producing the "Fallen Ones," or nephilim as they were called
in Genesis chapter 6. Is this merely a coincidence, or a historic fact? Sitchen
believes it was these Annunaki people that in-bred with our race and resulted
in the rise and fall of civilization past.
My argument would be that the Annunaki were what Genesis called the "sons
of God," which married the "daughters of men" and produced
"men of old, men of renown." (Genesis chapter 6) Apparently, Sitchen
has not examined the same archeological and pre-historic record that I have,
and I believe that this small err in interpretation has been the topic of
heated debate by theologians ever since. One point that I would like to
underscore is the fact that according to my interpretation, these Annunaki, or
sons of God, were not the fallen angels that many speculate. The office held by
an angel is messenger, and they would be what some would call the workers that
tend to the mundane tasks of care giving to the heavens and relative worlds
therein. By their very nature, the angels, fallen or otherwise, are not sexed,
nor could they produce offspring as some have suggested. Furthermore, I would
argue that these "giants," as the translation calls them in the King
James and the Hebrew Torah, were not the result of inbreeding by angels, nor
did they produce them. The key here is the statement in Genesis 6 that states
that they were present BEFORE the sons of God came down, and therefore could
not have produced the Nephilim, or giants
"There were giants in those days, and also after that, the sons of God
came down and took for them women of whom they chose.... Their offspring were
men of old, men of renown."
THEORY: NEPHILIM WERE DINOSAURS Has anyone ever considered, that the
fallen angels were spirits, who chose to rebel against God in the great
"war in the heavens," as described in Revelations, in the HOLY
BIBLE? Is it that much of a stretch of the imagination, to suggest that the
nephilim were in fact dinosaurs? Their bones can be found in the archeological
and geologic record, which was what Genesis chapter 6 was describing, not the
product of fallen angels, nor of the Annunaki as sons of God.
HYPOTHESIS: THE FACTS ARE NOT ALL IN, THEREFORE, THE HISTORIC RECORD IS
RIFE WITH DISTORTIONS, WHICH HAS KEPT THE FACTS FROM COMING TO LIGHT.
We must consider all of the evidence, before we can lie claim to any discovery,
regardless of how popularized that theory may have become. Whether a result of
hype, distortion or misrepresentation, there are several key elements to this
story, which do not add up, and beg to be re-examined.
OBSERVATION
Regardless of Sitchen's interpretation of Nibiru and it relation to the arrival
of Annunaki, other aspects of the archeologic record do not agree with his
hypothesis, including speculation on the origins of Annunaki, and what relation
their appearance had with the orbit of what some have suggested was a planetary
body or brown dwarf like Nibiru. No one has determined, with any certainty,
that his or her appearance here had any relation to Nibiru's.
Lets start at square one, clear the slate and re-examine Sitchen theories of
Nibiru in light of other observations that other and I archeologists have presented
here. Sitchen's archeological discoveries were fascinating on their own! They
are worthy of high regard, for their contribution to the pre-historic record.
Leave it at that until such time as additional supportive evidence can be
produced, to either substantiate or refute the dark star theory. Let's not
cheapen his discovery and contribution to science, by jumping to conclusions
about how this discovery fits into the remaining historic facts.
A NEW HYPOTHESIS IS BORN
There is another theory, which I present here, that Nibiru is a dark star, and
that its presence is a threat to our civilization. The potential affects from
its gravitational forces could be something the ancients wanted us to remember
alone, and may not have been a launching point for any advanced civilization's
including the Annunaki.
I know this. I know that the evidence suggest that there is a highly advanced
race of beings, present in our universe at this present time, and their
presence here may or may not have relevance to the UFO phenomenon today. Does
their presence here, coincide with the close proximity of Nibiru, and
subsequent arrival of the Annunaki as some have suggested, or is that just a
coincidental part of the execution of a Master plan, whereby these visitors are
present by design during major events in earth's historic record.
Let us not ignore any of the evidence surrounding our human origins; rather let
us examine all of the record which is there waiting to be discovered, at
various places around the earth. Then we can state our testimony, and proclaim
to all the truth about what the facts suggest happened during the prehistoric
record. That could only be possible, when we include all of the evidence of
what actually occurred during the earliest record of humankind. Therefore, we
must not exclude any part of the historic record, whether kept by Sumerians or
by Moses, all must agree, and if there is conflict, find whatever may be
overlooked before re-examining the archeologic record. Then we will be able to
establish what is scientific fact and what is hype or fiction. To take such a
narrow view, and then to amplify this misconception, is both heretical and
certainly not good science. It may sell allot of books, it may even cause us to
re-examine the archeological record; it must not be presented in a disjointed
manner, using supposed events that are unrelated to factual events, which
do not agree with the facts.
CONSIDER THIS: RE-EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE! I have in my possession a full 2
hour documentary, that features video footage of Egypt's leading archeologist,
exploring miles of subterranean tunnels under the sphinx and inside the base of
the great pyramid of Egypt, all showing signs of flooding, and a great deluge
that washed them clean with sand. There is Biblical Evidence. You see, it says
in Genesis 6, that the "sons of God came down and took for them women of
whom they chose." But then it says later in the "Book of
Genesis," that God was displeased with man, because His creation had disowned
Him. God said "My spirit will not always strive with man," and said
this because "He is FLESH!" now we can take that literally, to mean
that it was man's very nature, that led to the fall of mankind by way of the
flood.
THE FLOOD WAS A NATURAL EVENT, and had mankind been listening to God as
he did in the Garden he would have been warned just as Noah did.
LITTLE KNOWN FACTS ABOUT THE FLOOD: There was not one drop of rain prior
to the flood, so when God told Noah to build it, it took a great deal of faith.
No one had ever seen rain. To imagine continents splitting apart would have
been an even greater stretch of their imagination. At that time, every drop of
moisture came up from the ground, like a mist and watered the earth, which
seeped from the underground reserves, which exuded from the underground lakes.
The flood was worldwide, not localized. Many archeological sites that can be
traced back to that period show signs of a great flood; these are sites I have
personally examined. Don't take my word for it. Go see for yourselves! There is a lot of evidence that what
is now underground caverns, were once filled with...H2O!
This fact was first revealed by myself, and subsequently verified by
scientists, when they discovered that a continental shift had led to the break
of this one singular continent, also known as ATLANTIS forming the continents
that we see today, thereupon releasing a vast reservoir of water, shooting into
the skies great torrents and sheets of water, to rain down from the "flood
gates," This is a geologic fact, often ignored by scientists but true and
verifiable.
THE STAR OF BETHLEHEM UFO
http://www.uforc.com/religion/AF-wa_UFORC_p40.html
As the pillar of Fire rested upon the temple, and God literally lived in the
holy of holies, he knew that their blood sacrifices were just a preparation to
show that we could live with God if we could please God. But only the best,
unblemished Jewish priest would be allowed to enter where God dwelt from that
cylindrical UFO.
That is why, when we celebrate Christmas, we should rejoice, because God sent
his Son, Jesus Christ as atonement for our sin nature, our flesh. He inspired
Mary by inception from a UFO filled with the Holy Spirit that had overshadowed
her near a well where she and Elizabeth were drawing water. It sounds like a
classic UFO encounter if replayed today. Christ's inception was pure, as was
his conception, untouched by human hands in any way, so by divine hands His
seed was planted.
Christ had made this incredible sacrifice, so that someday we too could be like
the angels. This is a feat that we could never achieve alone, even with all of
the ascended masters in the universe, no one would do except the one who arose
from the dead and held the keys of life...and death in his hands...and He had a
direct connection with the UFO.
THE 'STAR' OF BETHLEHEM AND THE BIRTH OF CHRIST
Although they try to dispute it, the Star of Bethlehem was not a star that
could be divined by mystics or soothsayers. It could not have been an
astrological potent, because God does not allow that form of worship FORBIDDEN.
I will show that the star of Bethlehem had to be a UFO, and it was this divine
sign, that gave Christ his divinity and connection with God. Every single
prophet before Him had that unique and particular distinction...no one else.
When Christ arose from the dead, angels were seen in his death chamber
immediately after his disappearance from the tomb. You see my friend,
everything that I say here is true, and mark my words that this too shall come
to pass...because God has a plan for us and it started with the birth of his
son by a virgin, in a manger in a little town of Bethlehem. So I present to
you, some research I did on the STAR OF BETHLEHEM, and I explode the myth and
reveal the truth about this important event in man's history.
Jesus Christ was and is the King of the Angels, the King of Kings, and the Lord
of lords. Our salvation was assured when He died on the cross, fulfilling God's
requirement for a perfect, unblemished blood sacrifice when he gave his life
freely on a hill called Skull Rock, or "Golgotha." God placed his
seal on Christ in the form of UFO activity. What began with a birth, signified
by a UFO, ended with His ascension into a UFO cloud; Jesus was the promised
one, in the tradition of all the prophets before him. This was God's assurance
that He would keep his promise to His sons and daughters, which we are like the
angels. Christ paid the ultimate price so that we may live eternally, as the
"sons and daughters" of the living God. Now we can inherit our
promised land, along with our space brothers and sisters through Jesus, who
died for each and every one us.